It was just reported that a mass grave containing 72 bodies in a border town near the Texas border has been found.
How can this be? Our Homeland Security Secretary, Janet Napolitano keeps telling us these stories are exagerations and we need to stop pepetuating the myth that the border is unsafe. She told us, with a straight face I might add that the borders are safer than ever.
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
--Inigo Montoya from the movie, The Princess Bride
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/04/07/mexican-authorities-mass-grave-holding-5-bodies/
http://azstarnet.com/news/local/border/article_62367634-8867-546a-9aa0-934266355df1.html
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/lt_drug_war_mexico
Saturday, April 9, 2011
So you think socialized medicine is a good idea
The following is from Vision2America, a web site emailed to me:
It’s a bit like a supermarket manager dying of starvation or a bottled-water distributor dying of thirst: In the U.K., a former National Health Service (NHS) director died while waiting for medical care — at her own hospital. The Daily Mail reports:
Margaret Hutchon, a former mayor, had been waiting since last June for a follow-up stomach operation at Broomfield Hospital in Chelmsford, Essex.
But her appointments to go under the knife were cancelled four times and she barely regained consciousness after finally having surgery.
Her devastated husband, Jim, is now demanding answers from Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust — the organisation where his wife had served as a non-executive member of the board of directors.
He said: "I don't really know why she died. I did not get a reason from the hospital. We all want to know for closure. She got weaker and weaker as she waited and operations were put off."
Not to be cruel, but the reason is simple.
It’s called government-run health care.
Source: Click Here for Full Story
http://visiontoamerica.org/story/-socialized-medicine-director-dies-waiting-for-operation.html
It’s a bit like a supermarket manager dying of starvation or a bottled-water distributor dying of thirst: In the U.K., a former National Health Service (NHS) director died while waiting for medical care — at her own hospital. The Daily Mail reports:
Margaret Hutchon, a former mayor, had been waiting since last June for a follow-up stomach operation at Broomfield Hospital in Chelmsford, Essex.
But her appointments to go under the knife were cancelled four times and she barely regained consciousness after finally having surgery.
Her devastated husband, Jim, is now demanding answers from Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust — the organisation where his wife had served as a non-executive member of the board of directors.
He said: "I don't really know why she died. I did not get a reason from the hospital. We all want to know for closure. She got weaker and weaker as she waited and operations were put off."
Not to be cruel, but the reason is simple.
It’s called government-run health care.
Source: Click Here for Full Story
http://visiontoamerica.org/story/-socialized-medicine-director-dies-waiting-for-operation.html
You can tell a lot about a person by how they view our military
You can tell a lot about someone by the way they view our military
Let me be clear, there is a difference between the rank and file versus the leadership in Washington. Although I may see the average rank and file Democrat as misguided and ill-informed, I don’t see them as inherently evil. The Democrat leadership, on the other hand, I do see as inherently evil. I would offer Nancy Palosi, Harry Reid and Obama as examples.
I was raised a Democrat but managed to think for myself and didn’t follow the path of actually believing the Democrat rhetoric and mantra of, “The Democrats are for the poor man and the Republicans are for the rich man.” In fact I believe that statement to be patently false.
The Republican leadership has always preached less government and enabling everyone – rich and poor alike, to achieve their dreams. The Democrat leadership, on the other hand believes you’re too stupid to make it on your own and you need the government (and specifically them) to make it.
What I see today is the dope-smoking hippies of the 60s (my era) now running the country; into the ground and up the access ramp to hell to be specific. They still believe that they are entitled to whatever you have. You know, “What’s mine is mine and what’s yours is mine.”
I remember how to this day I get annoyed at an old song from the 70s by a group called the 5-man-electrical band. That band and the band that covered the song sang, “…so I jumped on the fence and yelled to the house, HEY, what gives you the right to put up a sign to keep me out or to keep mother nature in!”
I’ll tell you what gives them the right, they worked their ass off to pay for the house and you didn’t. If you want your own house so you can go out and put up a ‘no trespassing’ sign, go out and get a job and earn it! Those who haven’t earned something generally don’t have any pride or interest in preserving it.
Our military men and women have earned our respect. They don’t demand it but they have earned it.
Our military men and women and their families have been treated as second class throw-aways who are expendable by the current Democrat administration. I’m disgusted!
It’s important to remember that until recently the Democrats controlled the House, the Senate and the White House. They were charged with providing a budget for the nation. They not only didn’t provide one, they didn’t even attempt to provide one. Now after spending more money – our money to a tune that is greater than all money spent between 1776 and 2005 they want to continue on this trend. They have what it takes to take what you have – just like the hippy on the fence yelling to the house.
These hypocrites who would want us to believe they are right down there with us are filthy rich. Their are more millionaire Democrats than Republicans in Washington, D.C. but they still want you to believe they are poor and struggling.
We were just faced with a budget battle that pitted a Republican Congress who wanted to put the brakes on this wild spending and reduce the budget by $100 billion against a Democrat leadership who not only didn’t want to reduce spending but actually wanted to increase spending, i.e. business-as-usual.
One of the things at the heart of this debate was whether our military was going to be paid or not. We have faced budget showdowns before but never has a President and his ilk been so inherently open with their contempt for the hard working men and women of our military and their families. They said putting a separate rider in to make sure the military was paid on time was a “distraction”. A distraction, eh?
The Republicans wanted to make sure our fine military folks were paid during this debate. The Speaker of the House said he would not take his pay until a deal was worked out. One Democrat said she would not return the money, that she had bill and student loans to pay. Like our military men and women don’t?? What arrogance! Obama and the Democrats would still be paid but decided the military men and women were just expendable nuisances for them and wouldn’t be paid on time. They aren’t fit to carry the dirty laundry of our military men and women! They disgust me.
Around 1995-’96 our government ‘shut down’, but Bill Clinton still made sure our military was paid. What has happened to us? It’s a rhetorical question. Obama and the current batch of socialist hippies who run the country is what has happened.
Recently we had a whole batch of Democrats thrown out of office in what could only be construed as a referendum. The 2012 election is coming up and we need to finish the job. We need to get rid of those selfish career politicians who are destroying our country and that includes RINOS (Republicans-in-name, only) while they get rich and continue to draw pensions after only serving one term while the rest of us have to actually earn a living and watch them take a bigger and bigger bite out of our earning to give to pet projects and to our enemies who hate our guts.
It’s time to elect folks who believe we need to live within our budget, just like you and I have to do at home and who honor our military men and women with the respect they deserve.
Let me be clear, there is a difference between the rank and file versus the leadership in Washington. Although I may see the average rank and file Democrat as misguided and ill-informed, I don’t see them as inherently evil. The Democrat leadership, on the other hand, I do see as inherently evil. I would offer Nancy Palosi, Harry Reid and Obama as examples.
I was raised a Democrat but managed to think for myself and didn’t follow the path of actually believing the Democrat rhetoric and mantra of, “The Democrats are for the poor man and the Republicans are for the rich man.” In fact I believe that statement to be patently false.
The Republican leadership has always preached less government and enabling everyone – rich and poor alike, to achieve their dreams. The Democrat leadership, on the other hand believes you’re too stupid to make it on your own and you need the government (and specifically them) to make it.
What I see today is the dope-smoking hippies of the 60s (my era) now running the country; into the ground and up the access ramp to hell to be specific. They still believe that they are entitled to whatever you have. You know, “What’s mine is mine and what’s yours is mine.”
I remember how to this day I get annoyed at an old song from the 70s by a group called the 5-man-electrical band. That band and the band that covered the song sang, “…so I jumped on the fence and yelled to the house, HEY, what gives you the right to put up a sign to keep me out or to keep mother nature in!”
I’ll tell you what gives them the right, they worked their ass off to pay for the house and you didn’t. If you want your own house so you can go out and put up a ‘no trespassing’ sign, go out and get a job and earn it! Those who haven’t earned something generally don’t have any pride or interest in preserving it.
Our military men and women have earned our respect. They don’t demand it but they have earned it.
Our military men and women and their families have been treated as second class throw-aways who are expendable by the current Democrat administration. I’m disgusted!
It’s important to remember that until recently the Democrats controlled the House, the Senate and the White House. They were charged with providing a budget for the nation. They not only didn’t provide one, they didn’t even attempt to provide one. Now after spending more money – our money to a tune that is greater than all money spent between 1776 and 2005 they want to continue on this trend. They have what it takes to take what you have – just like the hippy on the fence yelling to the house.
These hypocrites who would want us to believe they are right down there with us are filthy rich. Their are more millionaire Democrats than Republicans in Washington, D.C. but they still want you to believe they are poor and struggling.
We were just faced with a budget battle that pitted a Republican Congress who wanted to put the brakes on this wild spending and reduce the budget by $100 billion against a Democrat leadership who not only didn’t want to reduce spending but actually wanted to increase spending, i.e. business-as-usual.
One of the things at the heart of this debate was whether our military was going to be paid or not. We have faced budget showdowns before but never has a President and his ilk been so inherently open with their contempt for the hard working men and women of our military and their families. They said putting a separate rider in to make sure the military was paid on time was a “distraction”. A distraction, eh?
The Republicans wanted to make sure our fine military folks were paid during this debate. The Speaker of the House said he would not take his pay until a deal was worked out. One Democrat said she would not return the money, that she had bill and student loans to pay. Like our military men and women don’t?? What arrogance! Obama and the Democrats would still be paid but decided the military men and women were just expendable nuisances for them and wouldn’t be paid on time. They aren’t fit to carry the dirty laundry of our military men and women! They disgust me.
Around 1995-’96 our government ‘shut down’, but Bill Clinton still made sure our military was paid. What has happened to us? It’s a rhetorical question. Obama and the current batch of socialist hippies who run the country is what has happened.
Recently we had a whole batch of Democrats thrown out of office in what could only be construed as a referendum. The 2012 election is coming up and we need to finish the job. We need to get rid of those selfish career politicians who are destroying our country and that includes RINOS (Republicans-in-name, only) while they get rich and continue to draw pensions after only serving one term while the rest of us have to actually earn a living and watch them take a bigger and bigger bite out of our earning to give to pet projects and to our enemies who hate our guts.
It’s time to elect folks who believe we need to live within our budget, just like you and I have to do at home and who honor our military men and women with the respect they deserve.
Sunday, April 3, 2011
More shenanigans from those peace-loving Muslim extremists
Kabul, Afghanistan – More shenanigans from those peace-loving Muslim extremists
Someone disrespected my religion so I’m going to kill and be-head you. Does that about cover it?
We have some ‘pastor’ in Florida decide to burn the Koran so those peace-loving Muslim extremists decided they would make some folks who had nothing to do with it pay.
Given that logic, am I to assume it’s ok to go be-head some Muslims in America who refer to people like me as infidels and have no qualms about burning the Holy Bible?
Please keep in mind there are people in the U.S. who are trying to demand that Shariah law be adopted in America. Honor killings would then be perfectly acceptable under the new Shariah law. Of course if you’re opposed to it you could be labeled an extremist Muslimphobe.
Let me be clear, I’m opposed to any religion that thinks it’s ok to murder and be-head people who disagree with your religion; especially when their religion is totally intolerant. I’m perfectly ok with you trying to get America to adopt your Shariah law, so long as you’re ok with Americans telling you to take a hike and go back to your country if you’re so happy with it.
Call me strange but if I were a woman and my husband beat the heck out of me under the misguided guise of religiously correct, you had damn well not go to sleep with me in the house. But that’s just me.
Someone disrespected my religion so I’m going to kill and be-head you. Does that about cover it?
We have some ‘pastor’ in Florida decide to burn the Koran so those peace-loving Muslim extremists decided they would make some folks who had nothing to do with it pay.
Given that logic, am I to assume it’s ok to go be-head some Muslims in America who refer to people like me as infidels and have no qualms about burning the Holy Bible?
Please keep in mind there are people in the U.S. who are trying to demand that Shariah law be adopted in America. Honor killings would then be perfectly acceptable under the new Shariah law. Of course if you’re opposed to it you could be labeled an extremist Muslimphobe.
Let me be clear, I’m opposed to any religion that thinks it’s ok to murder and be-head people who disagree with your religion; especially when their religion is totally intolerant. I’m perfectly ok with you trying to get America to adopt your Shariah law, so long as you’re ok with Americans telling you to take a hike and go back to your country if you’re so happy with it.
Call me strange but if I were a woman and my husband beat the heck out of me under the misguided guise of religiously correct, you had damn well not go to sleep with me in the house. But that’s just me.
Saturday, March 26, 2011
School training excercise has anti-immigration, pro-gun as villian
"An emergency drill set to take place in an Iowa school Saturday involves an “anti-immigration” pro-gun student shooting dozens of students in a racially-motivated shooting spree."
The Operation Closed Campus claims to be a simple training exercise for emergency responders and support organizations to prepare them for a possible shooting scenario. The event involves involving roughly 300 people, local police, hospitals and the Red Cross.
The scenario involves a fictitious 18-year-old senior who has become upset over national immigration policies and decides to enlist the help of some "white supremacy affiliates".
The bad guy is portrayed as being decidedly anti-immigration (the term is: anti illegal immigration) and his family "is known to be firearm enthusiasts, if not fanatics” For the record, a "firearm fanatic" is anyone who owns a firearm, according to these folks. Does that mean the military and police are firearm fanatics?
The scenario goes on to have our anti-immigration firearm fanatic “blurting racial slurs and that he is tired of them moving in and stealing jobs and money from Americans” then “pulls a handgun from his waistband, shooting one of the minority students.”
"A 17-year-old friend of the shooter then joins him in "firing upon anyone in their path and chasing down anyone who is against their ill-perceived stand,” the plan says."
How cliche can we get with this folks? It's a rhetorical question. I've learned that the ignorance of these folks is boundless.
Kevin Elwood, superintendent of Treynor Community Schools, says the exercise was only constructed for the purpose of securing Department of Homeland Security Grant funding, which requires the drill simulate a terrorism scenario. Really? Well let's try this scenario on for size and see how it flies:
The scenario would be a bunch of illegal Mexican gang-bangers are upset over some Anglos opposing an influx of violence in their community.
The gang-bangers come to the school and begin shouting racial slurs at the Anglos and eventually pull handguns out of their waste bands and begin shooting everyone they can while shouting, "Viva la Mexico!"
How long do you think it would take for AZ Rep Raul Grijalva, Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton to join the fight? How long would it be before Geraldo Rivera would be sensationalizing the exploitation of portraying illegals, sorry, undocumented workers, in a bad light?
Let me be clear, I have no problem with folks immigrating to America, Mexican or otherwise, so long as they come here legally, want to be here and are productive citizens who obey the law and aren't rambling about how we need to adapt to their culture, instead of the other way around. If you love your country; fine. Stay there and work to change things in your country. American is my country and if I prefer your country I'll move their and embrace your culture.
Portraying decent gun owners or people who oppose illegal immigration as domestic terrorists is unconscionable and should be exposed and fought.
WAIT! STOP THE PRESS! I've had a half hour to think on this and have decided to re-write my scenario. In an effort to celebrate diversity and make the scenario as inclusive as possible I've changed it to the following:
A black trans-gender, upset over never having been to Africa purchases a Chinese-made handgun from a Muslim terroist they met at an anti-tea party rally. They then drive their Eco-friendly Prios, running on fuel purchased from Venezuela to the school, while trying to sext on their cell phone and load Russian made ammo into their Chinese made hand gun at the same time. Realizing they haven't had their Starbucks coffee with extra caffeine the shooter goes across the street from the street (Casa de Kaka) to get a strong caffeine-laced coffee.
While at Starbucks the shooter gets into a conversation with a patron over the misuse of handicap stickers.
Being even more enraged, now, the shooter goes back to the other side of Casa de Kaka, pulls out the Chinese made handgun with the Russian made ammo and begins firing while rambling something about finding out they really aren't African at all, but Dutch. Did I miss anyone?
Or, we can just go with something more realistic. How 'bout a whack job of your own nationality choosing who is just pissed off at the world and would shoot you over anything. You know, like the one who shot Congressman Gabby Giffords and 12 others?
Contrary to efforts from moron-extraordinaire sheriff Clarence Dupnik to portray the shooter about like the Iowa school scenario does, the shooter had no interest in right wing politics, talk radio, Sarah Palin, the Pope, soggy corn flakes or anything else. He's a whack-job who would probably be set off because he didn't like the color of your shoes. I'm bored of having gun owners or people opposed to illegal immigration portrayed as being extremists.
The Operation Closed Campus claims to be a simple training exercise for emergency responders and support organizations to prepare them for a possible shooting scenario. The event involves involving roughly 300 people, local police, hospitals and the Red Cross.
The scenario involves a fictitious 18-year-old senior who has become upset over national immigration policies and decides to enlist the help of some "white supremacy affiliates".
The bad guy is portrayed as being decidedly anti-immigration (the term is: anti illegal immigration) and his family "is known to be firearm enthusiasts, if not fanatics” For the record, a "firearm fanatic" is anyone who owns a firearm, according to these folks. Does that mean the military and police are firearm fanatics?
The scenario goes on to have our anti-immigration firearm fanatic “blurting racial slurs and that he is tired of them moving in and stealing jobs and money from Americans” then “pulls a handgun from his waistband, shooting one of the minority students.”
"A 17-year-old friend of the shooter then joins him in "firing upon anyone in their path and chasing down anyone who is against their ill-perceived stand,” the plan says."
How cliche can we get with this folks? It's a rhetorical question. I've learned that the ignorance of these folks is boundless.
Kevin Elwood, superintendent of Treynor Community Schools, says the exercise was only constructed for the purpose of securing Department of Homeland Security Grant funding, which requires the drill simulate a terrorism scenario. Really? Well let's try this scenario on for size and see how it flies:
The scenario would be a bunch of illegal Mexican gang-bangers are upset over some Anglos opposing an influx of violence in their community.
The gang-bangers come to the school and begin shouting racial slurs at the Anglos and eventually pull handguns out of their waste bands and begin shooting everyone they can while shouting, "Viva la Mexico!"
How long do you think it would take for AZ Rep Raul Grijalva, Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton to join the fight? How long would it be before Geraldo Rivera would be sensationalizing the exploitation of portraying illegals, sorry, undocumented workers, in a bad light?
Let me be clear, I have no problem with folks immigrating to America, Mexican or otherwise, so long as they come here legally, want to be here and are productive citizens who obey the law and aren't rambling about how we need to adapt to their culture, instead of the other way around. If you love your country; fine. Stay there and work to change things in your country. American is my country and if I prefer your country I'll move their and embrace your culture.
Portraying decent gun owners or people who oppose illegal immigration as domestic terrorists is unconscionable and should be exposed and fought.
WAIT! STOP THE PRESS! I've had a half hour to think on this and have decided to re-write my scenario. In an effort to celebrate diversity and make the scenario as inclusive as possible I've changed it to the following:
A black trans-gender, upset over never having been to Africa purchases a Chinese-made handgun from a Muslim terroist they met at an anti-tea party rally. They then drive their Eco-friendly Prios, running on fuel purchased from Venezuela to the school, while trying to sext on their cell phone and load Russian made ammo into their Chinese made hand gun at the same time. Realizing they haven't had their Starbucks coffee with extra caffeine the shooter goes across the street from the street (Casa de Kaka) to get a strong caffeine-laced coffee.
While at Starbucks the shooter gets into a conversation with a patron over the misuse of handicap stickers.
Being even more enraged, now, the shooter goes back to the other side of Casa de Kaka, pulls out the Chinese made handgun with the Russian made ammo and begins firing while rambling something about finding out they really aren't African at all, but Dutch. Did I miss anyone?
Or, we can just go with something more realistic. How 'bout a whack job of your own nationality choosing who is just pissed off at the world and would shoot you over anything. You know, like the one who shot Congressman Gabby Giffords and 12 others?
Contrary to efforts from moron-extraordinaire sheriff Clarence Dupnik to portray the shooter about like the Iowa school scenario does, the shooter had no interest in right wing politics, talk radio, Sarah Palin, the Pope, soggy corn flakes or anything else. He's a whack-job who would probably be set off because he didn't like the color of your shoes. I'm bored of having gun owners or people opposed to illegal immigration portrayed as being extremists.
Union compares MLK fight for sanitation worker's rights
The lengths the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) will go to seems to be boundless.
In a recent email to AFGE members the AFGE president, John Gage tells us of Dr. Marin Luther King being assasinated on April 4, 1968 while going to stand with sanitation workers "demanding their dream".
A few years ago I told my local AFGE union representaive that I wanted the form to quit AFGE. He asked why. I told him I was tired of my union dues going to only liberal candidates like Obama. I went on to explain that the union never supports conservative candidates. He said, "Well, we have to go with who is best for us." I told him to explain who "us" was. I told him the "us" he referred to was him and his fellow union hierarchy going to Hawaii each year on our dues money.
I told him that candidates like Obama have a socialist agenda. He replied, "What's wrong with that!" Nuff said.
In a recent email to AFGE members the AFGE president, John Gage tells us of Dr. Marin Luther King being assasinated on April 4, 1968 while going to stand with sanitation workers "demanding their dream".
A few years ago I told my local AFGE union representaive that I wanted the form to quit AFGE. He asked why. I told him I was tired of my union dues going to only liberal candidates like Obama. I went on to explain that the union never supports conservative candidates. He said, "Well, we have to go with who is best for us." I told him to explain who "us" was. I told him the "us" he referred to was him and his fellow union hierarchy going to Hawaii each year on our dues money.
I told him that candidates like Obama have a socialist agenda. He replied, "What's wrong with that!" Nuff said.
Geraldo to replace Marty McFly on Back to the Future
In Geraldo Rivera's latest offering of non-sensical giberish he opines the influx of Mexican population into the U.S. can be likened to the Irish coming to America in 1847, following the potato famine.
According to Geraldo, "I argue the transformation will help renew and replenish the country." Really? With what? Contrary to our twit Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, the borders are NOT safer than ever before. I know that for a fact. It isn't conjecture or racisct speculation; I live about 85 miles from the Mexican border and see the stories in the local newspaper on a daily basis.
Each morning starts with me reading the news or witnessing it first hand. I can systimatically show where murder, rape, kidnappings and drug arrests have dramatically increased in a matter of just a few years. I also file these newspaper reports and can show you that about 3 out of 4 times it involves someone with a Mexican surname. I can also show where many times an illegal (no, I didn't say the politically correct term of, 'undocumented workers')Mexican national was involed gets 3-5 years for murdering someone while at the same time a non-latino gets sentenced to 20+ years for armed robbery. That isn't racism or speculation -- that's a fact.
We also know that illegals routinely vote in elections and they vote for Democrats. Again, that has been documented and isn't a baseless claim on my part. It's not surprising that Democrats trying to get elected will do whatever it takes to get elected -- even if it involves harming the country to that end result.
Another fact Gerlado neglects to mention is the Irish wanted to be in this country, didn't demand preferential treatment and didn't fly Irish flags on top of a U.S. flag displayed below it upside down. The Irish weren't trying to turn America into Ireland on welfare.
Wake up, folks. There is a correct way of immigrating into America and those who are not willing to go that path are looking for amnesty after breaking the law. Those who come here legally WANT to be here and WANT to contribute to the betterment of American -- not its demise and exploitation.
To paraphrase, "Hello, McRivera! Anybody home?"
According to Geraldo, "I argue the transformation will help renew and replenish the country." Really? With what? Contrary to our twit Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, the borders are NOT safer than ever before. I know that for a fact. It isn't conjecture or racisct speculation; I live about 85 miles from the Mexican border and see the stories in the local newspaper on a daily basis.
Each morning starts with me reading the news or witnessing it first hand. I can systimatically show where murder, rape, kidnappings and drug arrests have dramatically increased in a matter of just a few years. I also file these newspaper reports and can show you that about 3 out of 4 times it involves someone with a Mexican surname. I can also show where many times an illegal (no, I didn't say the politically correct term of, 'undocumented workers')Mexican national was involed gets 3-5 years for murdering someone while at the same time a non-latino gets sentenced to 20+ years for armed robbery. That isn't racism or speculation -- that's a fact.
We also know that illegals routinely vote in elections and they vote for Democrats. Again, that has been documented and isn't a baseless claim on my part. It's not surprising that Democrats trying to get elected will do whatever it takes to get elected -- even if it involves harming the country to that end result.
Another fact Gerlado neglects to mention is the Irish wanted to be in this country, didn't demand preferential treatment and didn't fly Irish flags on top of a U.S. flag displayed below it upside down. The Irish weren't trying to turn America into Ireland on welfare.
Wake up, folks. There is a correct way of immigrating into America and those who are not willing to go that path are looking for amnesty after breaking the law. Those who come here legally WANT to be here and WANT to contribute to the betterment of American -- not its demise and exploitation.
To paraphrase, "Hello, McRivera! Anybody home?"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
