Barack Obama claimed Tuesday in an immigration speech in El Paso that his administration has gone “above and beyond” what Republicans asked for in border security.
Obama cites the addition of more Border Patrol agents and the drop in apprehensions of illegal border crossers and, believe it or not the low violent crime rates in U.S. border cities.
Really? Really?? Ok, how ‘bout a little reality check. That speech may fly with people who may have been living in a drug tunnel between the Mexican and American border for the last few years or those who would agree with you even if you said black is white and day was night. It would sit well with those here illegally but it won’t fly with those of us who live eighty-five miles from the Mexican border and don’t have to take your word for it.
The reality is we have Border Patrol agents testifying that they are under orders to turn around (“go north”) if they catch illegals or drug dealers near the border. The reality is Obama and his band of political gang-bangers are suing Arizona for doing the feds job that they refuse to do. The reality is, despite what former governor and current Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano continue to spout, the border is NOT safer than ever! The violence along the border is growing exponentially and is coming further and further on this side of the border. That, President Obama is the reality – not this fantasy myth that you and your cronies want to peddle to the American public in hopes of becoming a two-term dictator.
Each day there is an increasing number of bodies found missing their heads. Each day there are more bodies found in mass graves and strewn about the border cities. That President Obama and Secretary Napolitano is the reality. To pretend it is what it isn’t and to aid and abet is criminal and you and those who do so should be held criminally libel. And to think Attorney General Holder wants to hold CIA agents responsible for enhanced interrogation is just appalling. The CIA agents helped protect Americans – something your administration (regime) can’t claim.
Obama was quoted as saying, “All the stuff they’ve asked for, we’ve done,”. “But, I suspect there’s going to be some that are going to move the goal posts on us one more time.” Let’s be clear Mr. Obama, you haven’t done the things you promised and I have a whole file to document it. What you’ve done is hand us a turd and tried to sell us on the idea that there is a clean end to it.
Obama went on to say, “Maybe they’ll say we need a moat? Maybe they’ll want alligators in the moat,” Obama said. “They’ll never be satisfied. And I understand that, that’s politics. But the truth is that the measures we’ve put in place are getting results.”
Apparently Barack fancies himself as somewhat of a comedian. “Missed it by that much, Chief.” And the fact remains, despite your claims to the contrary, your measures haven’t produced results, unless, of course you’re speaking from the cartel’s viewpoint or the viewpoint of those hoping for the demise of this great country.
Obama called for those Republicans who walked away the last time demanding more border enforcement to now come back to the table and finish the work Congress started. Perhaps in the same fashion that the Democrats in Wisconsin did, perhaps?
“Today, the immigration system not only tolerates those who break the rules, it punishes the folks who follow the rules,” Obama said. You’ve just described your immigration policy to the letter, Mr. Obama. Now you just need to realize you’re talking about your own policies and not those of someone else.
Obama was booed loudly when he highlighted the administration’s building of border fences. Gee, why do you think that is and who do you think was booing you, Mr. President? Think maybe it was predominantly those who are here illegally?
As the old saying goes, don’t pee down my back and tell me it’s raining. What you’re selling is a lemon and we aren’t going to buy it again in 2012.
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Thursday, May 5, 2011
How much mess did Bush really leave Obama
How much of a mess did Obama really inherit form President Bush?
I was talking to a man today about the killing of Ben Laden. He was telling me how impressed he was with Obama planning the military operation to get OBL. I told him Obama couldn’t plan a bowel movement. He immediately whipped out the liberal’s standard mantra, “Well he’s better than the previous President.” I told him that no George Bush apologist am, I but I’d take exception to his factual accuracy. He responded with another Liberal catch-all, “He inherited George Bush’s big deficits.”
Ok, time to set the record straight on this much-repeated pile of flatulence. I realize the Kool aid (see Jim Jones if you don’t know who they were) drinkers will not be swayed by the facts but here we go anyway.
There are three branches of government, the legislative branch that makes the laws and controls the purse strings, the judicial branch that carries out the laws that Congress passes and the executive branch, aka: The President, who can not make law but has veto power.
Obama, like a talking doll has a limited number of responses and declarations. The one used most is the, “I inherited this mess from the previous administration.” line. To George W. Bush’s credit he’s stayed above the fray and has refrained from engaging in the finger-pointing his successor has brought to an art form. But then Bush has some class, something Obama will never understand any more than he appreciates the sacrifices our military men and women make.
A President can neither create a budget deficit nor a budget surplus. So when you hear the stories about the so-called “Clinton surplus” remember that the Congress was controlled by the Republicans at that time. That surplus was the first in 40 years. Coincidentally, it was the first time the Republicans controlled the Congress in 40 years.
When Obama was elected to the White House with a little help from his friends at ACORN (vote early and vote often), he inherited a deficit that was created by the Congressional Democrats at a time when Barack was in the Senate and was one of the biggest spenders.
While it is true Bush should have vetoed more of those spending bills, some that he approved of, the fact remains the Democrats controlled the Congress.
Until the recent 2010 mid-term elections the Democrats controlled the House, the Senate and the White House. Still, the President insists on whining like a little baby (my apologies to any babies who were offended by that statement) that he inherited this mess from Bush.
It is Barack, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid in the, until-only-recently-Democrat controlled Congress and Senate who created the massive deficit we now have. I particularly like the jobs created by his ‘stimulus’ bill that were created in Arizona’s 93 Congressional district. Much like Obama’s “57th” state, the Arizona 93 Congressional district doesn’t exist. I live in Arizona and we only have 13.
Most of the mess we’re in is compliments of the Congressional Democrats pushing the banks to make risky loans to people who couldn’t afford them. Most notably were Barney Frank and Senator Christopher Dodd. Unfortunately too many spineless Republicans went along.
In 2004 President Bush said that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac needed oversight the Democrats cried, “Foul” and played the race card; claiming the Republicans just wanted to keep poor people from buying a home. Ah, there’s that race card, again. The Dems know it will bring all but the strongest Conservatives to their knees. They suddenly find themselves defending against racism charges instead of having a substantive debate about the real issues and facts. That’s why I’m not intimidated by their tactic and will gladly engage those folks on a substantive debate and shut the race card down mo ricky tick (A Marine Corp term).
So the next time a Liberal hits you with that tired old heaping helping of bovine flatulence, tell them to get their facts straight and educate them. Many voted for Obama to prove they aren’t racist. Perhaps this time they’ll vote against him in 2012 to prove they aren’t morons. Nah, never happen. Their mind is made up and they won’t be swayed by the facts.
I was talking to a man today about the killing of Ben Laden. He was telling me how impressed he was with Obama planning the military operation to get OBL. I told him Obama couldn’t plan a bowel movement. He immediately whipped out the liberal’s standard mantra, “Well he’s better than the previous President.” I told him that no George Bush apologist am, I but I’d take exception to his factual accuracy. He responded with another Liberal catch-all, “He inherited George Bush’s big deficits.”
Ok, time to set the record straight on this much-repeated pile of flatulence. I realize the Kool aid (see Jim Jones if you don’t know who they were) drinkers will not be swayed by the facts but here we go anyway.
There are three branches of government, the legislative branch that makes the laws and controls the purse strings, the judicial branch that carries out the laws that Congress passes and the executive branch, aka: The President, who can not make law but has veto power.
Obama, like a talking doll has a limited number of responses and declarations. The one used most is the, “I inherited this mess from the previous administration.” line. To George W. Bush’s credit he’s stayed above the fray and has refrained from engaging in the finger-pointing his successor has brought to an art form. But then Bush has some class, something Obama will never understand any more than he appreciates the sacrifices our military men and women make.
A President can neither create a budget deficit nor a budget surplus. So when you hear the stories about the so-called “Clinton surplus” remember that the Congress was controlled by the Republicans at that time. That surplus was the first in 40 years. Coincidentally, it was the first time the Republicans controlled the Congress in 40 years.
When Obama was elected to the White House with a little help from his friends at ACORN (vote early and vote often), he inherited a deficit that was created by the Congressional Democrats at a time when Barack was in the Senate and was one of the biggest spenders.
While it is true Bush should have vetoed more of those spending bills, some that he approved of, the fact remains the Democrats controlled the Congress.
Until the recent 2010 mid-term elections the Democrats controlled the House, the Senate and the White House. Still, the President insists on whining like a little baby (my apologies to any babies who were offended by that statement) that he inherited this mess from Bush.
It is Barack, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid in the, until-only-recently-Democrat controlled Congress and Senate who created the massive deficit we now have. I particularly like the jobs created by his ‘stimulus’ bill that were created in Arizona’s 93 Congressional district. Much like Obama’s “57th” state, the Arizona 93 Congressional district doesn’t exist. I live in Arizona and we only have 13.
Most of the mess we’re in is compliments of the Congressional Democrats pushing the banks to make risky loans to people who couldn’t afford them. Most notably were Barney Frank and Senator Christopher Dodd. Unfortunately too many spineless Republicans went along.
In 2004 President Bush said that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac needed oversight the Democrats cried, “Foul” and played the race card; claiming the Republicans just wanted to keep poor people from buying a home. Ah, there’s that race card, again. The Dems know it will bring all but the strongest Conservatives to their knees. They suddenly find themselves defending against racism charges instead of having a substantive debate about the real issues and facts. That’s why I’m not intimidated by their tactic and will gladly engage those folks on a substantive debate and shut the race card down mo ricky tick (A Marine Corp term).
So the next time a Liberal hits you with that tired old heaping helping of bovine flatulence, tell them to get their facts straight and educate them. Many voted for Obama to prove they aren’t racist. Perhaps this time they’ll vote against him in 2012 to prove they aren’t morons. Nah, never happen. Their mind is made up and they won’t be swayed by the facts.
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Where are the arrests?
What a proud moment for Tucson, again.
We have a bunch of spoiled little brats showing up at a Tucson Unified School District meeting, chaining themselves together and to the chairs, pounding on the tables and shutting down a board meeting. These are the same type of morons who will destroy things if their basketball team loses the championship. They will also destroy things if their team wins. "Remember, we're dealing with the common clay of the new frontier. You know, morons."
--From the movie, Blazing Saddles
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss making the so-called ethnic studies class and elective.
Our little angels have learned well from the class. It teaches racism, that America stole Arizona from the Mexicans, Americans are an enemy, etc. The proponents of the class (of which they have no class) also claim the ethnic studies classes improve the students grades.
Actually the fact is their grades are lower.
I would rhetorically ask shy these little brats weren't cited, arrested and their parents ordered to come down to the court house. It's rhetorical because I know the answer and you probably do, too. If that were to happen the cops would be labeled, 'racists'. Trust me, if it had been Anglo kids that is exactly what would have happened.
If these little darlings want America to be more like Mexico, you know, rapes, kidnaps, murder, drug deals, government corruption and be-headings, I suggest they go 85 miles to the south and be happy. Hell, it would make us happy if they did.
Meanwhile they need to have their ass spanked, forced to get a job and actually earn something for a change. Then I want to see someone come and destroy it just like they do so they can see how it feels. Perhaps some graffiti on their car they just worked their butt off to buy would be a good start.
Please click on the link below to see the video that was in the Arizona Daily Star.
http://azstarnet.com/online/video/youtube_f21ef734-70e8-11e0-a1f4-001cc4c002e0.html
We have a bunch of spoiled little brats showing up at a Tucson Unified School District meeting, chaining themselves together and to the chairs, pounding on the tables and shutting down a board meeting. These are the same type of morons who will destroy things if their basketball team loses the championship. They will also destroy things if their team wins. "Remember, we're dealing with the common clay of the new frontier. You know, morons."
--From the movie, Blazing Saddles
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss making the so-called ethnic studies class and elective.
Our little angels have learned well from the class. It teaches racism, that America stole Arizona from the Mexicans, Americans are an enemy, etc. The proponents of the class (of which they have no class) also claim the ethnic studies classes improve the students grades.
Actually the fact is their grades are lower.
I would rhetorically ask shy these little brats weren't cited, arrested and their parents ordered to come down to the court house. It's rhetorical because I know the answer and you probably do, too. If that were to happen the cops would be labeled, 'racists'. Trust me, if it had been Anglo kids that is exactly what would have happened.
If these little darlings want America to be more like Mexico, you know, rapes, kidnaps, murder, drug deals, government corruption and be-headings, I suggest they go 85 miles to the south and be happy. Hell, it would make us happy if they did.
Meanwhile they need to have their ass spanked, forced to get a job and actually earn something for a change. Then I want to see someone come and destroy it just like they do so they can see how it feels. Perhaps some graffiti on their car they just worked their butt off to buy would be a good start.
Please click on the link below to see the video that was in the Arizona Daily Star.
http://azstarnet.com/online/video/youtube_f21ef734-70e8-11e0-a1f4-001cc4c002e0.html
Thursday, April 21, 2011
What's the real motive?
The fact Obama lies every time he speaks (lectures) to the American public isn’t arguable.
The latest example was the White House begging the S&P to not release figures showing America is about to lose it’s stellar credit rating, thanks to his policies. Despite Obama trying to play it off and suggest all was well in Gotham, the S&P revealed a picture quite different.
We also had the interview in Texas recently. When asked by the interviewer why Obama thought he was so unpopular in Texas Obama responded by saying Texas was a Conservative state and he only lost by a couple of points. The interviewer corrected him by saying he lost by 11 points.
Despite reports to the contrary by the CBO (Congressional Budget Office) that Obama care was actually going to cost us more, Obama continues to claim otherwise.
In a recent address Obama tried to tie the collapse of a bridge in Minnesota to Bush budget policies – knowing full well that the bridge collapsed because of a design flaw and had nothing to do with Bush economic policies.
In a recent Face Book town hall an individual asked what the President could do about helping his family buy a home. Rather than correctly tell the individual, “Me and my cronies like Christopher Dodd, Charlie Rangel, et al have screwed things up so badly that it’s laughable that you would even ask such a stupid question; you don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of purchasing a home now.”, he simply suggested that they rent, instead.
Obama recently told a group of his groupies that we shouldn’t use coal as an energy source “…because as we all know, coal causes asthma.” That’s non-sense. Coal does not cause asthma.
His idea for those who complain of high gasoline prices is to, “get a tune up and make sure your tire pressure is correct.” Unless you are driving a relic, lack of carburetors on most cars today precludes tune-ups. Correcting the tire pressure will help your tires last longer but the impact on your gas mileage is negligible.
The President knows that federal budgets can legally only be projected for 10 years. Yet, in an effort to make his budget seem to be in line with Eric Cantor and the GOP’s budget he claimed his budget would save $4 trillion over the next 12 years. Just a bit of slight- of- hand. The fact is his budget would only reduce a little over $2 trillion over the next 10 years.
Not long after his so-called stimulus went into effect he claimed fictional jobs that he supposedly created in Congressional districts in Arizona that don’t even exist. He was probably thinking of jobs he created in our 57th state that he spoke of.
The fact of the matter is I haven’t even scratched the surface of the bravo sierra this President has spewed. You can always tell when he’s lying because his lips are moving.
Knowing that he is a flim-flam man who makes used car salesman look honest makes me wonder what his real agenda is – aside from the obvious – wealth distribution.
He says people like him in his tax bracket need to pay more in taxes, even though he paid far less than he would have us believe.
Where is the transparency he spoke of when he was candidate Obama? Where is the turn-around in the economy he promised? OK, I’ll give him that one. There has been a dramatic turn around in the economy. It just wasn’t for the better. Our economy is a disaster and he and his ilk want to continue spending money we don’t have.
I don’t have the band-width to address all of the lies this President has told. He has shown he will say whatever he thinks he has to in order to get re-elected. He’s never left campaign mode. He says he needs more than one term to finish the job. He means to finish the U.S. off, once and for all! If he’s done this much damage in two years, one can only imagine what he can do with a second term; certainly more than the Communists could have ever hoped to have achieved in decades.
We need to make sure Obama is a one-term President. Keep in mind he’s trying to get amnesty for illegals (undocumented Democrats) to insure that end. And let’s not forget the ACORN policy of, ‘vote early and vote often’. These people are crooks. There is no other way of sugar-coating it.
If Obama truly is the smartest man in America, as we're being lead to believe, we have to assume that he believes all of us are the stupidist people on the planet. Not all of us, Mr. President, just the ones who voted for you and are Kool Aid drinkers who refuse to admit they screwed up.
The latest example was the White House begging the S&P to not release figures showing America is about to lose it’s stellar credit rating, thanks to his policies. Despite Obama trying to play it off and suggest all was well in Gotham, the S&P revealed a picture quite different.
We also had the interview in Texas recently. When asked by the interviewer why Obama thought he was so unpopular in Texas Obama responded by saying Texas was a Conservative state and he only lost by a couple of points. The interviewer corrected him by saying he lost by 11 points.
Despite reports to the contrary by the CBO (Congressional Budget Office) that Obama care was actually going to cost us more, Obama continues to claim otherwise.
In a recent address Obama tried to tie the collapse of a bridge in Minnesota to Bush budget policies – knowing full well that the bridge collapsed because of a design flaw and had nothing to do with Bush economic policies.
In a recent Face Book town hall an individual asked what the President could do about helping his family buy a home. Rather than correctly tell the individual, “Me and my cronies like Christopher Dodd, Charlie Rangel, et al have screwed things up so badly that it’s laughable that you would even ask such a stupid question; you don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of purchasing a home now.”, he simply suggested that they rent, instead.
Obama recently told a group of his groupies that we shouldn’t use coal as an energy source “…because as we all know, coal causes asthma.” That’s non-sense. Coal does not cause asthma.
His idea for those who complain of high gasoline prices is to, “get a tune up and make sure your tire pressure is correct.” Unless you are driving a relic, lack of carburetors on most cars today precludes tune-ups. Correcting the tire pressure will help your tires last longer but the impact on your gas mileage is negligible.
The President knows that federal budgets can legally only be projected for 10 years. Yet, in an effort to make his budget seem to be in line with Eric Cantor and the GOP’s budget he claimed his budget would save $4 trillion over the next 12 years. Just a bit of slight- of- hand. The fact is his budget would only reduce a little over $2 trillion over the next 10 years.
Not long after his so-called stimulus went into effect he claimed fictional jobs that he supposedly created in Congressional districts in Arizona that don’t even exist. He was probably thinking of jobs he created in our 57th state that he spoke of.
The fact of the matter is I haven’t even scratched the surface of the bravo sierra this President has spewed. You can always tell when he’s lying because his lips are moving.
Knowing that he is a flim-flam man who makes used car salesman look honest makes me wonder what his real agenda is – aside from the obvious – wealth distribution.
He says people like him in his tax bracket need to pay more in taxes, even though he paid far less than he would have us believe.
Where is the transparency he spoke of when he was candidate Obama? Where is the turn-around in the economy he promised? OK, I’ll give him that one. There has been a dramatic turn around in the economy. It just wasn’t for the better. Our economy is a disaster and he and his ilk want to continue spending money we don’t have.
I don’t have the band-width to address all of the lies this President has told. He has shown he will say whatever he thinks he has to in order to get re-elected. He’s never left campaign mode. He says he needs more than one term to finish the job. He means to finish the U.S. off, once and for all! If he’s done this much damage in two years, one can only imagine what he can do with a second term; certainly more than the Communists could have ever hoped to have achieved in decades.
We need to make sure Obama is a one-term President. Keep in mind he’s trying to get amnesty for illegals (undocumented Democrats) to insure that end. And let’s not forget the ACORN policy of, ‘vote early and vote often’. These people are crooks. There is no other way of sugar-coating it.
If Obama truly is the smartest man in America, as we're being lead to believe, we have to assume that he believes all of us are the stupidist people on the planet. Not all of us, Mr. President, just the ones who voted for you and are Kool Aid drinkers who refuse to admit they screwed up.
If the shoe fits...
The following story was listed in the Arizona Daily Star, a Tucson, AZ paper:
"The law, formerly known as HB 2281, prohibits courses that promote the overthrow of the U.S. government; promote resentment toward a race or class of people; are designed primarily for students of a particular ethnic group; and that advocate ethnic solidarity instead of treating students as individuals.
The plaintiffs said they believe the law is the product of racial bias aimed specifically at Hispanics."
Gee, why on earth would they think that? RAZA was teaching overthrow of the government, the U.S. belongs to Mexico and racism was being taught. Sounds like the shoe fits.
http://azstarnet.com/news/local/education/article_88ab2202-d7b5-5fcb-80dc-08f0068bd8c3.html
"The law, formerly known as HB 2281, prohibits courses that promote the overthrow of the U.S. government; promote resentment toward a race or class of people; are designed primarily for students of a particular ethnic group; and that advocate ethnic solidarity instead of treating students as individuals.
The plaintiffs said they believe the law is the product of racial bias aimed specifically at Hispanics."
Gee, why on earth would they think that? RAZA was teaching overthrow of the government, the U.S. belongs to Mexico and racism was being taught. Sounds like the shoe fits.
http://azstarnet.com/news/local/education/article_88ab2202-d7b5-5fcb-80dc-08f0068bd8c3.html
Only the police should have firearms file
From the, “Only police and military should have firearms.” file
The Arizona Daily Star reports a Pima County Sheriff’s detective has met the enemy and the enemy was him.
Detective Kurt Dabb was taken to the hospital after accidentally shooting himself in the leg while getting ready to attend a firearms qualification.
This will not look good on his resume. There is no report on whether Detective Dabb will sue himself or not. It appears he doesn’t have a leg to stand on.
The Arizona Daily Star reports a Pima County Sheriff’s detective has met the enemy and the enemy was him.
Detective Kurt Dabb was taken to the hospital after accidentally shooting himself in the leg while getting ready to attend a firearms qualification.
This will not look good on his resume. There is no report on whether Detective Dabb will sue himself or not. It appears he doesn’t have a leg to stand on.
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Do we need more gun laws?
RIO DE JANEIRO
The shooter walked into a school and shot 12 middle school students, aged 12-15 to death and then killed himself. He left the obligatory rambling note behind and was even gracious enough to leave his wishes for how he wanted his body to be dealt with.
The death toll stands at 12 but may go even higher since 3 more students are in grave condition.
The gun control crowd would have us believe this is a nexus for tougher gun laws. Really? Well "riddle me this, Batman"; how is it that this could happen with the strict gun laws they have in place in RIO DE JANEIRO?
Here is what the Arizona Daily Star reports about gun laws there:
"Brazil already has strict gun laws. A 2003 law sharply limited who could legally purchase firearms and carry guns on the street. Anyone wanting to buy a gun must be at least 25, pass a psychological test, prove they need the weapon, have no criminal record, and provide proof that they attended courses on handling guns."
So how did the shooter do this? Surely he complied with all of the above; it's the law. Are we to believe gun laws only effect the law-abiding and that perhaps criminals, (who are the ones we need to worry about) don't give a damn about all of the laws that prevent the rest of us from defending our families and ourselves? It's a rhetorical question. The answer is, "YES".
It's time we see all of those who would impose strict gun laws on law-abiding citizens for what they are -- naive.
This tragedy clearly shows why gun laws don't work. CRIMINALS AND WHACK JOBS DON'T OBEY THE LAW! It's part of the job description. Make no mistake, the gun law proponents will eroneously try to use this tragedy as a nexus for the need for more gun laws. Yes, yes, I know that makes no sense but we aren't dealing with logical people. We're dealing with morons, many of whom own a gun for themselves but think you shouldn't. They're elitists and believe in their own mind that they can be trusted but you can't. The list of anti-gun celebrities and politicians who say you shouldn't have a gun but they have one or have armed bodyguards is too long to mention here.
We must fight any and all attempts to use tragedies like this and like the one in Tucson, AZ as showing the need for more gun laws. GUN LAWS DON'T DETER CRIMINALS AND CRAZIES.
The shooter walked into a school and shot 12 middle school students, aged 12-15 to death and then killed himself. He left the obligatory rambling note behind and was even gracious enough to leave his wishes for how he wanted his body to be dealt with.
The death toll stands at 12 but may go even higher since 3 more students are in grave condition.
The gun control crowd would have us believe this is a nexus for tougher gun laws. Really? Well "riddle me this, Batman"; how is it that this could happen with the strict gun laws they have in place in RIO DE JANEIRO?
Here is what the Arizona Daily Star reports about gun laws there:
"Brazil already has strict gun laws. A 2003 law sharply limited who could legally purchase firearms and carry guns on the street. Anyone wanting to buy a gun must be at least 25, pass a psychological test, prove they need the weapon, have no criminal record, and provide proof that they attended courses on handling guns."
So how did the shooter do this? Surely he complied with all of the above; it's the law. Are we to believe gun laws only effect the law-abiding and that perhaps criminals, (who are the ones we need to worry about) don't give a damn about all of the laws that prevent the rest of us from defending our families and ourselves? It's a rhetorical question. The answer is, "YES".
It's time we see all of those who would impose strict gun laws on law-abiding citizens for what they are -- naive.
This tragedy clearly shows why gun laws don't work. CRIMINALS AND WHACK JOBS DON'T OBEY THE LAW! It's part of the job description. Make no mistake, the gun law proponents will eroneously try to use this tragedy as a nexus for the need for more gun laws. Yes, yes, I know that makes no sense but we aren't dealing with logical people. We're dealing with morons, many of whom own a gun for themselves but think you shouldn't. They're elitists and believe in their own mind that they can be trusted but you can't. The list of anti-gun celebrities and politicians who say you shouldn't have a gun but they have one or have armed bodyguards is too long to mention here.
We must fight any and all attempts to use tragedies like this and like the one in Tucson, AZ as showing the need for more gun laws. GUN LAWS DON'T DETER CRIMINALS AND CRAZIES.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
